s i s t e m a o p e r a c i o n a l m a g n u x l i n u x | ~/ · documentação · suporte · sobre |
5. Hardware for BackupsYou should have a tape drive for backup. Ideally, your tape backup should be able to image your entire disk. Choosing a tape drive used to be pretty complicated, with a plethora of different formats and media to chose from. It's much simpler now that the combination of cheap CD-ROM drives and huge hard disks has effectively killed off QIC and other sub-megabyte formats. There are a bunch of non-tape niche technologies for backup, including floptical disks, Bernoulli boxes, Iomega and SyQuest removable drives, and magneto-optical drives. Ignore them all; they're half-assed attempts to combine a backup device with the fast random access needed for working storage that don't do either job very cost-effectively, especially when you consider the (high) cost of their media. Only magneto-optical drives are likely to have much of a future, and that only given improvements in access speed. Digital Data Storage (DDS) capacities are a good match for today's multi-gigabyte drives (this is essentially the same technology as Digital Audio Tape or DAT). I'm told that Hewlett-Packard DDS devices are especially good, not surprising given HP's traditional obsession with reliability and overengineering stuff. All the DDSs I know about are SCSI devices. At the high end, 8mm helical-scan tape (the stuff used in Sony camcorders) competes with DDS. This is a single-source tchnology, from Exabyte. Capacities are 2.2 and 5 gig, transfer speeds up around 500Kbytes/sec. However, a correspondent says ``Don't touch Exabyte. I've got three. All three have been sent back for warranty repair at least once.'' He also says ``A significant expense can be the cleaning tapes. Exabyte is notorious for this.'' So it's probably a good idea to stick with DDS if you have high-capacity requirements. OTOH, Carl Renneberg <renneber@sci-log.apana.org.au> says of the Exabyte that his drive has proven to be rock steady and reliable, and recommends it with the following provisos:
Carl has found that, where someone has had poor experience with Exabyte drives, it's because the owner - or the previous owner - did not take care of the drive, or used junk tapes. Here's a quick summary of the major alternative DDS formats: Table 2. DDS types
DDS tape drives (and tapes) come actually in four variants: DDS, DDS-DC, DDS-2, and DDS-3. These are supposed to be downward compatible (e.g. DDS-2 reads/writes DDS-DC but not vice versa.) DDS and DDS-DC use 60m and 90m tapes; the -DC version adds hardware compression. DDS (non-DC) should be considered obsolete. DDS-2 adds 120m tapes and denser recording: There is also a yet-newer DDS-3 standard, with yet again higher density on the tape. DDS-3 is bleeding edge (high premium), but DDS-2 is coming down now, and can make the difference between single-tape and and multi-tape backups (which can often make the difference between daily backups and "why didn't I..." hand-wringing.) |
Andrew Comech's The Cheap /Linux/ Box page is a useful guide to building with current hardware that is updated every two weeks. Andrew also maintains a short-cut version.
The Caveat Emptor guide has an especially good section on evaluating monitor specifications.
Dick Perron has a PC Hardware Links page. There is lots and lots of good technical stuff linked to here. Power On Self Test codes, manufacturer address lists, common fixes, hard disk interface primer, etc.
Anthony Olszewski's Assembling A PC is an excellent guide to the perplexed. Not Linux-specific. If you're specifically changing a motherboard, see the Installing a Motherboard page. This one even has a Linux note.
Tom's Hardware Guide covers many hardware issues exhaustively. It is especially good about CPU chips and motherboards. Full of ads and slow-loading graphics, though.
The System Optimization Site has many links to other worthwhile sites for hardware buyers.
Christopher B. Browne has a page on Linux VARs that build systems. He also recommends the Linux VAR HOWTO.
Jeff Moe has a Build Your Own PC page. It's more oriented towards building from parts than this one. Less technical depth in most areas, but better coverage of some including RAM, soundcards and motherboard installation. Features nifty and helpful graphics, one of the better graphics-intensive pages I've seen. However, the hardware-selection advice is out of date.
The Linux Hardware Database provides, among other things (e.g., drivers, specs, links, etc.), user ratings for specific hardware components for use under Linux. Our ratings take a lot of the guess work out of choosing which hardware to buy for a Linux box. The site also provides several product-specific resources (i.e., drivers, workarounds, how-to) that help users get hardware working after they have made a purchase.